Add Row 
Add 
San Francisco Supervisors Demand Answers on SFPD Overtime Practices
In a tense budget hearing on April 30, 2025, San Francisco's supervisors took to task the SFPD’s assistant police chief over persistent issues surrounding the department's overtime expenditures. Despite dramatic surges in costs year over year, the police department is once again asking for a staggering $92 million to cover overtime for officers and other personnel for the upcoming fiscal year.
The supervisors expressed their alarm and frustration, echoing a concern that has echoed in city hearings for years. Supervisor Shamann Walton articulated this sentiment when he stated, "We have the same conversation every single year." It underscores a growing discontent with what many see as a systemic failure to control overtime spending within the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD).
The Cost of Overtime Abuse
Data presented in a city audit highlighted the dramatic rise in overtime costs, which soared to an eye-watering $108 million in the 2022-23 fiscal year—more than double from $53 million during the 2018-19 period. Such figures raise important questions about operational efficiency, especially when compounded by findings of officers violating established policies, including the abuse of sick leave, and taking second jobs in private security.
This ongoing misuse of the overtime system not only hampers public resources but also erodes community trust in law enforcement, as noted by Supervisor Joel Engardio. The sentiment is echoed across various corridors of city government, with worries that unchecked overtime costs are a symptom of broader management issues. Even those traditionally aligned with police funding, like Supervisor Matt Dorsey, acknowledged the negative perception these practices create among citizens.
Understanding the Staffing Crisis
SFPD officials defend the uptick in overtime costs by attributing it to a staffing crisis, citing a deficit of about 500 officers from the recommended levels. Assistant Chief David Lazar emphasized that with only 1,466 full-duty staff available, the department is struggling to maintain adequate coverage. He remarked, "In my 33 years at the department, I've never seen this much overtime being spent." The dual challenges of budget adherence and staffing shortages pose significant hurdles for the department moving forward.
As this staffing crisis continues, it amplifies concerns around public safety in San Francisco. The lack of personnel has led to fewer officers available to patrol and respond to incidents, creating an environment that can foster crime and reduce community safety.
Implications for Public Trust and Budget Decisions
The financial implications are staggering and raise questions about the city’s budgeting processes. Each year, supervisors find themselves facing the same dilemma—whether to approve additional funding for the SFPD’s overtime requests while knowing that oversight has historically faltered. This unending cycle ultimately affects overall public perception and trust in the police force, something that both sides of the political aisle lament.
This predicament demonstrates a need for a more systematic overhaul of how the SFPD manages its resources and deploys its personnel. Communities can benefit from clear reporting mechanisms for overtime use that would allow citizens to hold the department accountable, thus restoring confidence in public safety measures. The call for transparency is not an indictment of the officers or a lack of faith in their abilities but a demand for a more efficient and accountable system.
The Road Ahead for SFPD and San Francisco
As San Francisco continues to navigate through budget constraints and public safety challenges, the discussions surrounding police overtime expenditures are more relevant than ever. Residents from various backgrounds—including parents, young adults, and community advocates—are looking for effective solutions that not only tackle issues of crime but address how law enforcement is funded and held accountable.
The questions raised will only persist as this dialog progresses. With each budget cycle, the SFPD is presented with an opportunity to adjust oversight methods and align its spending with the public’s expectations for transparency and responsibility.
Conclusion: The Need for Action
Ultimately, the city’s leaders must confront these persistent issues head-on. The path forward will require collaboration between the police department, city supervisors, and the community. By establishing a framework for improved communication and transparency, San Francisco can work toward solutions that foster public safety while ensuring accountability within its police force. Community engagement and feedback will be vital as the city navigates these systemic challenges in law enforcement management.
Add Row 
Add 
Write A Comment