Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

{COMPANY_NAME}

cropper
update
Add Element
update

CALL US

+1 (415) 993-3922

Add Element
update

EMAIL US

robert@sfpressmedia.com

Add Element
update

WORKING HOURS

Mon-Fri: 9am-6pm

Add Element

Add Element
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Industry Feature
Add Element
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
  • update
January 11.2026
3 Minutes Read

How Steve Kerr’s Ostrich Tactic Is Transforming Warriors' Turnovers

Coach demonstrates strategy on court, Warriors turnover strategy focus.

Steve Kerr’s Unconventional Tactic: Erasing 'Turnovers' from the Court

In the high-stakes world of the NBA, where split-second decisions can define careers and season outcomes, the Golden State Warriors have found themselves grappling with a critical issue: turnovers. For almost all of his eleven years at the helm, head coach Steve Kerr has been increasingly frustrated by his team's habit of giving the ball away, particularly due to careless mistakes. This season, despite the star power of players like Steph Curry, the Warriors ranked near the bottom in the league as they struggled with turnovers, averaging 15.7 per game.

A Bold Move: Embracing Silence

In an intriguing pivot away from traditional coaching methods, Kerr has adopted an unconventional approach. Instead of bombarding his players with negativity around their mistakes, he has chosen to stop addressing the term 'turnover' altogether, likening this strategy to an ostrich burying its head in the sand. "Just hit singles, be solid, solid wins the game," he stated, embodying a humorous phrase yet reflecting a serious tactical reevaluation. Surprisingly, this ‘Ignorance is Bliss’ method appears to be working; recent games show a marked reduction in turnovers, with the figures dropping significantly over the past few match-ups.

Less Talking, More Playing: The Warriors' Transformation

By presiding over a scenario where players are not constantly reminded of their mistakes, Kerr believes that players have been able to focus less on hesitation and more on play execution. This tactic is particularly relevant for a team driven by fluid movement and instinct. The philosophy echoes the idea that over-analyzing errors can hinder a player’s performance. Instead of freezing under pressure, the Warriors can now play with more freedom. This strategy has led to dramatic improvements on the court, with assists skyrocketing and turnovers diminishing.

Innovative Psychology: A Lesson from the Past

Kerr isn’t new to this tactic. He previously implemented it during the 2022 playoffs against the Memphis Grizzlies when turnover issues similarly threatened their performance. At the time, countless meetings and film sessions failed to render improvement, pushing Kerr to experiment with a different approach—silence, which ultimately led to greater success for the team. Such unique methods highlight the psychological challenges athletes face and how strategic adjustments can sometimes yield better results than traditional practices.

Understanding the Impact: Insights from Players

While Kerr's method may seem unorthodox, players like Curry appreciate the shift. “We have to walk that fine line,” he mentioned. Even without a constant focus on turnovers, they are still acutely aware of the game’s demands on maintaining possession. This balance allows the Warriors to rediscover their core strengths—trust, teamwork, and collective execution, essential elements in a successful basketball offense.

Facing the New Look Hawks

The Warriors are set to face the Atlanta Hawks, who have recently reshaped their lineup by trading their star point guard, Trae Young. Hawks newcomers Corey Kispert and CJ McCollum are expected to face the undaunted Warriors squad that’s leveraging Kerr’s innovative strategy. With their recent success at limiting turnovers, the Warriors appear poised to capitalize against a new-look Hawks team, illustrating the relevance of adaptability not only to tactics but also in response to shifting competition.

Conclusion: A Lesson for Players and Coaches Alike

Kerr’s approach serves as a reminder to players and coaches: sometimes, less can be more. By reframing a problem and allowing athletes the mental space to play fluidly, effective strategies can emerge that break through the noise of negativity. While ignoring problems generally isn't viable outside the court's parameters, within the dynamic of professional basketball, this unorthodox method has unlocked players’ instincts to lead the Warriors into a new era of performance management.

Events

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts

U.S. Strikes ISIS in Syria: Understanding the Fallout from Operation Hawkeye

Update Understanding the Context of U.S. Military Strikes in Syria On January 10, 2026, the United States launched significant military strikes against Islamic State (ISIS) targets in Syria. This action follows a brutal ambush in December that resulted in the tragic deaths of two American soldiers and a civilian interpreter near Palmyra. These retaliatory strikes, named Operation Hawkeye Strike, mark a decisive continuation of the U.S. commitment to combating ISIS in the region. According to U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), at least 35 targets were hit using over 90 precision munitions from more than 20 aircraft. The Tragic Events That Triggered Retaliation The ambush that prompted Operation Hawkeye on December 13, 2025, was particularly devastating. Two members of the Iowa National Guard, Sgt. Edgar Brian Torres-Tovar, 25, and Sgt. William Nathaniel Howard, 29, were killed in the attack, alongside Ayad Mansoor Sakat, the civilian interpreter. These events have galvanized U.S. military action, as President Trump emphasized a strong message of retribution: "if you harm our warfighters, we will find you and kill you anywhere in the world, no matter how hard you try to evade justice.” The Broader Implications of the Strikes These recent strikes are not just a reaction to the ambush but part of a broader strategy against ISIS remnants in Syria. The U.S. has been engaged in military operations in the region since ISIS's rise to power in the mid-2010s, which saw the militant group seizing significant territory across Syria and Iraq. CENTCOM's operations aim to dismantle any remaining infrastructure and stop ISIS from posing further threats to U.S. and coalition forces. The ongoing operations are indicative of a commitment to combat terrorism that has lasted over a decade. As noted in other reports, U.S. military actions coupled with changes in governance in Syria have significantly diminished ISIS's territorial claims. Local and Global Reactions The response to these military strikes has been mixed. While many support the U.S. commitment to protecting its forces and countering terrorism, others question the effectiveness and long-term ramifications of such military involvement. Given the geopolitical complexities in Syria, including relations with Syria’s central government, which has recently authorized U.S. coordination, it raises questions about the future of U.S. policy in the region. Looking Ahead: What's Next for U.S. Operations As Operation Hawkeye continues, military officials expect these strikes to be part of a lengthy campaign against ISIS remnants. There is an understanding that these retaliatory operations will also involve complexities with local partners and may influence the strategic landscape in the Middle East. Additionally, there are implications for a reassessment of U.S. military strategy as the nature of threats from ISIS evolves. Conclusion As this situation unfolds, it is crucial to remain engaged and informed about the implications of U.S. military presence in Syria. Keeping an eye on news and updates on the ground can provide more clarity on the ongoing efforts against ISIS and the broader geopolitical context affecting U.S. operations.

Canadians Reconsider Ties: Majority Support Stronger Trade Relations with China

Update Canadians Reconsider Ties: Majority Support Stronger Trade Relations with ChinaAs Prime Minister Mark Carney embarks on a pivotal visit to China aimed at mending trade ties, recent polling indicates a notable shift in Canadian sentiment toward closer economic relations with the Asian powerhouse. According to an Ipsos survey, 54% of Canadians now favor stronger ties with China, contrasting sharply with the eight out of ten who advocated for distancing from China's economic influence just a few years ago.The Changing Landscape of Canadian Trade OpinionsThe Ipsos poll, conducted in early December 2025, reflects a recalibration of Canadian perspectives influenced by external economic pressures rather than an intrinsic affinity towards China. Darrell Bricker, CEO of Ipsos Public Affairs, suggests that the shift is more about re-evaluating Canada’s global trading strategy in light of U.S. trade policies than a newfound respect for China. “People are thinking about who in the world we’re going to trade with,” Bricker explained, emphasizing the economic realities following the U.S. trade war under President Trump.The Background: A History of Tension and TariffsHistorically, Canada’s relations with China have been fraught with tension, particularly following the highly publicized detention of Canadian citizens Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor in 2018, which was widely considered retaliation against Canada’s arrest of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou. Trade policies took a hit as a result, with Canada imposing significant tariffs on a variety of Chinese imports, leading to reciprocal tariffs from China on Canadian agricultural products. Notably, the introduction of a 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles and a 25% tax on aluminum reflects a strategy mirroring U.S. policies aimed at protecting local industries.Political and Economic Stakes of the Carney VisitWith Carney’s upcoming trip marking the first official visit by a Canadian prime minister to China since 2017, the stakes are high. This meeting presents not merely an opportunity to foster better diplomatic ties but also a chance to navigate complex challenges in trade relationships. Political leaders from provinces reliant on agriculture, such as Saskatchewan, are advocating for a reevaluation of tariffs to restore vital agricultural exports to China.Public Opinion and Economic ConcernsThe latest survey also reveals a pragmatic lineup of priorities in Canadians’ perceived value of trade agreements. A dominant 71% of respondents underscore the necessity for economic benefits, surpassing concerns for human rights and environmental standards, which ranked lower overall in terms of critical importance. This pragmatism highlights a shift towards prioritizing immediate economic advantages over moral considerations in trade negotiations.Trade Balance: Values Versus Economic InterestsDespite the apparent emphasis on economic benefits, there remains substantial discourse around balancing trade with ethical considerations. A considerable faction of the population, approximately 25%, supports pursuing trade agreements based exclusively on democratic values and human rights, even at the cost of slower economic growth. However, the poll indicates that a significant majority (around 75%) would favor economic opportunities over adherence to strict values-based trade deals.Implications for Canadian BusinessesAmidst these shifting sentiments, industry experts caution that Canadian businesses must tread carefully. Concerns voiced by analysts like Margaret McCuaig-Johnston emphasize the necessity of setting “guardrails” around transactions with China to safeguard national interests and avoid pitfalls that could jeopardize business integrity. “We have to be really careful about our relations with China,” she notes, underlining the potential risks associated with deepening economic ties under the current political climate.Future Perspectives: Navigating Complex IdentitiesAs Canadians contemplate their nation’s relationship with China, the conversation poses an intriguing complexity: how to align economic pursuits with national integrity and security. Kovrig’s commentary brings an important perspective to the debate, advocating for a keen awareness of the implications of trade that entangles values and economic reality.Conclusion: Moving ForwardThe path forward will require nuanced strategy and a deep understanding of both Canadian public sentiment and global economic realities. With opinions on trade with China shifting from outright opposition to cautious engagement, it will be essential for Prime Minister Carney to negotiate a balance that acknowledges the ever-evolving dynamics of international trade, while also upholding Canadian values.

Canada's Mark Carney Condemns Iran's Brutal Crackdown Amid Protests

Update Protests in Iran: A Call for Freedom and DignityThe protests in Iran have entered their second week, with an increasing number of voices, including Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, condemning the regime's brutal crackdown on dissent. In a recent post on social media platform X, Carney expressed profound concern over reports of violence, intimidation, and arbitrary arrests carried out by Iranian authorities against their own citizens. As he stated, "Canada strongly condemns the killing of protesters and urges Iran to allow for freedom of expression and peaceful assembly without fear of reprisal." This message resonates deeply with the Iranian-Canadian community, which remains closely connected to their families and friends back home in Iran.The Ground Situation in IranAs detailed in various reports, the Iranian government has acknowledged the ongoing demonstrations, yet security forces have intensified their efforts to suppress them. The Human Rights Activists News Agency has reported at least 72 fatalities and over 2,300 detentions since the protests began. The Iranian regime’s historical pattern of violence against its own people appears unrelenting, with the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei signaling a forthcoming crackdown.A Digital Blackout: A New Form of RepressionSimultaneously, an unprecedented communications blackout has severely restricted internet access, complicating efforts to gauge the actual scale of the unrest. As cybersecurity expert Amin Sabeti noted, the current internet restrictions are the worst in Iran's history, signaling a strategic escalation by the government to operate with reduced scrutiny. This approach has raised alarms among human rights advocates who argue that the blackout is a deliberate attempt to sever the link between protesters and the international community.International Responses: Standing in SolidarityAs the Iranian people bravely demand their rights, international support continues to pour in. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio publicly declared support for the Iranian demonstrators while historical figures like Barry Rosen, who was taken hostage during the 1979 revolution, have described the current situation as a definitive breaking point. Rosen urges that such national resolve will define Iran's future for generations. Meanwhile, several U.S. politicians reiterated their backing for the Iranian people's fight for freedom.Implications for Global GeopoliticsThe ongoing protests in Iran have repercussions beyond its borders. As tensions escalate within the region, countries like Canada have revamped travel advisories, urging their citizens to avoid travel to Iran. Flights have been suspended, hindering evacuations and prompting the government to advise those present in Iran to exit if possible. These measures highlight the intensifying geopolitical stakes tied to Iran's internal strife.A Community in Mourning: Iranian-Canadian PerspectivesFor Iranian-Canadians, the protests are not just a distant issue; they spark deep emotional connections to their heritage. Many express their grief and solidarity with the protesters through social media, community gatherings, and peaceful demonstrations. The Iranian diaspora eagerly follows the developments back home, hoping for a future where freedom and dignity reign.Future Directions: Where Do We Go From Here?The cries for freedom in Iran are a poignant reminder of the universal struggle against oppression. As calls for international solidarity arise, the global community must remain vigilant, advocating for the Iranian people amid their crisis. The next steps will define not only Iran’s political landscape but potentially alter the dynamics of regional stability in the Middle East.Your Role in Supporting ChangeIn light of these ongoing events, individuals and communities are encouraged to raise awareness through social media, participate in discussions that promote human rights, and support organizations dedicated to advocating for freedom in Iran. Each voice contributes to a chorus that demands change, regardless of geographical boundaries.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*